Psychiatric News
Professional News

Comparison of Patient-Protection Bills in Congress

Issue Senate House (Passed in July)
Malpractice lawsuits No provision Modifies ERISA so patients have broader legal recourse to collect damages from insurer. Plans can be fined up to $250,000 for withholding coverage.
Malpractice damages No cap Sets a $250,000 ceiling on "pain & suffering" damages for patient awards.
Internal appeals Mandated process.
Complaints must be addressed within 30 days and 72 hours for medical emergencies.
Mandated process with same decision deadlines as Senate plan.
External appeals Mandated binding process but limits reviews to medical expenses above $1,000 and experimental procedures. No limit on appeals but allows health plans to charge patients appealing between $25 and $100 or 10% of procedure. Plans not complying with results can be fined up to $250,000.
Gag rules Prohibits health plans from dictating to providers what treatment options may be discussed with patients. Beyond Senate bill, states doctor-patient conversations should not be restricted by health plan.
"HealthMarts" No provision Allows small businesses, insurers, and health care providers to form groups and purchase discounted health insurance.
Association health plans No provision Amends ERISA so church, trade, and business groups can form alliances and buy discounted health insurance.
Point-of-service option Required of employers with 50 or more workers but employees must pay cost difference. Required of employers except companies that offer insurance through HealthMarts or have insurance costs rise above 1 percent.

*Source: Congressional Quarterly Weekly, August 1, 1998